March 21, 2003

Side effects of war with Iraq.

Most people think that the United States will be able to defeat Iraq without too many casualties (at least on our side) and I tend to agree. And most of the opponents of war with Iraq say that the real problem is "winning the peace" and that we will be bogged down there at great expense for many years trying to establish a western democracy in a culture and religion that is not ready for it and we will only further Arab hatred and terrorism against us. While I think that is also probably true, I do not think it is the biggest problem.

In recent history the United States has taken several actions which although they seemed sensible to some at the time have proven to have had serious side effects which denigrate any beneficial effects they may have had. For example, arming the Afghan rebels to defeat the Russians in Afghanistan worked, but it led to the rise of the Taliban and its support for al Qaeda and terrorism against the US. Likewise, selling arms and chemicals to Iraq and Saddam Hussein to defeat Iran (our enemy at the time), led to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait and the current war to get rid of the very "weapons of mass destruction" we helped to create.

Now, with the precedent set by our war against Iraq, any country will be able to justify a war by saying so and so supports terrorism and might attack us, or has murdered its own people, or has failed to obey a UN resolution (which includes lots of countries including the US). The concept of "preventive war" contradicts centuries of diplomatic and legal customs concerning war. There's a reason for following the rules of law although it may seem inconvenient at the time. For example, the recently caught kidnapper of Elizabeth Smart will still have a lawyer and a trial even though everyone "knows" he did it. And even though as in the case of O. J. Simpson, the guilty sometimes do get off, in the long run it's better to have the rule of law because not having it is even worse. It seems clear to everyone except perhaps a certain right wing faction in this country, that we failed to get the needed authority for war with Iraq and I am afraid this will come back to haunt us and the world. For example, why shouldn't Pakistan wage a preventive war against India on the grounds it might be a greater threat in the future?

Posted by mjm at March 21, 2003 02:38 PM

Comments

I just wanted to say thanks, mjm, for posting your thoughts. I have been reading many independent and mainstream sources dealing not only with the present "war", but with federal politics in general. Although Americans have always held a sense not to trust their government, it had never occurred to me how little faith I should ultimately put into it. Seemingly, it is much like a stage play in that the public only sees what the government wants to show. For every one questionable action that is brought to light, many more stay undiscovered in the shadows.
This "war" has heightened the public sense of fear, but I seriously doubt that it has made them aware of all the major flaws that have brought the federal government to this point. If history is correct, and superpowers only last as well as the actions they take, we may be coming to a fast close concerning economic influence and world leadership.
Enjoy the day,
bentpole

Posted by: bentpole at March 30, 2003 12:42 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?