Fri May 31 19:08:57 EDT 2019

Items of Interest

Various web links I found to be of interest recently.

  • The Peculiar Blindness of Experts

    Credentialed authorities are comically bad at predicting the future. But reliable forecasting is possible.

    In the 30 years since Ehrlich sent Simon a check, the track record of expert forecasters-in science, in economics, in politics-is as dismal as ever. In business, esteemed (and lavishly compensated) forecasters routinely are wildly wrong in their predictions of everything from the next stock-market correction to the next housing boom. Reliable insight into the future is possible, however. It just requires a style of thinking that's uncommon among experts who are certain that their deep knowledge has granted them a special grasp of what is to come.
    ...
    Hedgehogs are deeply and tightly focused. Some have spent their career studying one problem. Like Ehrlich and Simon, they fashion tidy theories of how the world works based on observations through the single lens of their specialty. Foxes, meanwhile, "draw from an eclectic array of traditions, and accept ambiguity and contradiction," Tetlock wrote. Where hedgehogs represent narrowness, foxes embody breadth.

  • Media Bias/Fact Check - Search and Learn the Bias of News Media

    A widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific. More info about it on Wikipedia.

    PolitiFact's take on Media Bias/Fact Check:

    Until Dave Van Zandt adds objective markers to the MB/FC rating scales and justifies every rating with real objective data, take the ratings with a boulder of salt. They're worthless without specific backing data.

    But then again also check out, PolitiFact Bias

    Who is without bias? Who to believe?

  • In America, it's better to be born rich than smart

    The "Born to Win, Schooled to Lose" report from the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce lays out the inequities: Children with low test scores from high-income families have a 71 percent chance of being affluent adults by the age of 25, compared to only a 31 percent chance for poor children with high test scores.

  • Universal basic income doesn't work. Let's boost the public realm instead

    A study of UBI trials concludes that making cash payments to all is no solution to poverty and inequality.

    It could find no evidence to suggest that such a scheme could be sustained for all individuals in any country in the short, medium or longer term - or that this approach could achieve lasting improvements in wellbeing or equality. The research confirms the importance of generous, non-stigmatising income support, but everything turns on how much money is paid, under what conditions and with what consequences for the welfare system as a whole.

  • Biology and Culture

    In this episode of the Making Sense podcast, Sam Harris speaks with Bret Weinstein about the moral panic at Evergreen State College, the concept of race, genetic differences between human populations, intersectionality, sex and gender, "metaphorical truth," religion and "group selection," equality, and other topics.

  • Why Go? - Key advantages you may have overlooked

    Go (programming language) makes it easier (than Java or Python) to write correct, clear and efficient code.

    • Minimalism
    • Code transparency
    • Compatibility
    • Performance


Posted by mjm | Permanent link | Comments
comments powered by Disqus